Any topic any time. No profanity.

Monday, October 25, 2010

Pelline Cracks Me Up!

Whenever anyone posts on Pelline's blog and uses brevity, Pelline trashes them and threatens their removal.  He also is constantly recommending those he disagrees with that they should post on some other blog.  This cracks me up because Pelline dishes it out and can't take in kind.  He constantly posts one liner insults on Pruett's, Steele's and Rebane's blogs then whines and threatens when someone does the same on his blog.  The difference between a liberal like Pelline and the rest of us freedom seekers is the old adage, "do as I say, not as I do".  That should be Pelline's heading on his blog.

Pelline and his ilk, Enos, Frisch and the NCDCC members posting there are intolerant of dissent, they are mean spirited and totally partisan lefty's.  The latest Pelline threat is against Michael Kesti, a person I do not know but I have read many times.  He is usually very bright and he doesn't like me.  But he usually puts the left on its heels and Pelline and his leftwingnuts don't like Kesti.  Here is the latest threat by Pelline after a comment by Kesti.

"Michael R. Kesti
Color-coded master spreadsheets? OH, MY!

Michael,
I find that you rarely have anything interesting to say. You are better suited to the “angry men” blogs."

Pelline is very childlike don't you think?

27 comments:

  1. Who knows, maybe JeffP is right. He most certainly has the 'right' to fashion the profile of his readership. I'm sure the "angry men" will continue to welcome Mr Kesti and anyone else who wants to air their ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I know Michael personally. He is very smart and he's a nice guy. If Micheal knew you personally, I am quite confident he'd like you sir.

    He's a bit frustrated with the economy (if I can speak for him)...but who isn't.


    Woodsy 2.1

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Profanity and name calling not allowd.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Real name required"...

    Woodsy 2.1 is a real name?

    So much for the rules here being applied to all.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought we covered this Steve. You sound like rain man.

    Woodsy 2.1

    ReplyDelete
  7. Todd's own stated use rule:

    "Real name required thank you"

    R-E-Q-U-I-R-E-D... look it up!

    ReplyDelete
  8. When do liberals realize that they do not dictate to people?

    If you want flying pigs one day and a purple pony the next, that is for you to decide, not some liberal busy-body.

    They'll get the memo very soon.


    Woodsy 2.1

    ReplyDelete
  9. Woodsy writes...

    If you want flying pigs one day and a purple pony the next, that is for you to decide, not some liberal busy-body.

    Gee isn't that like telling everyone one thing, but then 15 minutes later you'll change your mind because your first rule doesn't help your lost cause.....

    I think that one sums up things quite nicely!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't get it either...I don't mind using my real name but if it is not really required I will be using "Pine Cone 3.9" from now on.

    But hey, it's Todd's blog, he can make up the rules as he wants.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Why gosh, thanks. You two could start yout own blogs and then you can make up your own rules too. So how is it you all never address the post?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I do mind using my real name because I know what nasty babies liberals have become; and my family would be none too please for my opinions to result in harassment and boycotts of my families' business.

    Todd knows who I am and that's the bottom line. If you don't like it, well nobody really cares.

    Woodsy 2.1

    ReplyDelete
  13. Steve Dodge aka Pine Cone 3.9October 27, 2010 at 12:35 PM

    As far as addressing the post.....I agree, Jeff Pelline cracks me up as Todd does also! We can also agree on another thing...nobody cares!

    I also know Michael Kesti and, yes, he is smart and a nice guy.

    3 points of agreement.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I will be using "Pine Cone 3.9" from now on.....

    Maybe you should try the proper name and be know as ConeHead 3.9" from now on?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don't know know so that won't work. It appears you have no interest in anything other than being a pain so nice try.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Woodsy 2.1 is a big pussy!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Woodsy 3.9 says: "Woodsy 2.1 is a big pussy."

    ...I'd be careful Steve, you're not dealing with that kind of man and I take offense to that.

    Woodsy 2.1

    ReplyDelete
  18. Woodsy 2.1... so you claim I'm "Woodsy 3.9"?

    How can you claim to know who Woodsy 3.9 is? Stop making stuff up.

    Posters here can''t tell who Woodsy 2.1 is or Woodsy 3.9 is becasue neither one used their name as "required" by Tood's use rules.

    Maybe Woodsy 2.1 and Woodsy 3.9 will come out of hiding and follow the posted use rules.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mr. Enos, unless you're the only Steve on the planet, I think you'd be well served to understand that I was referring to Mr. Stephen Dodge aka Woodsy 3.9.

    Do you think Mr. Dodge's post is appropriate Mr. Enos?

    I realize that you'd love to know who I am (and Mr. Stephen Dodge is very close to learning the hard way) but I have a family to protect from bratty liberals who lash out at anybody that doesn't subscribe to their dogma.

    I think Mr. Dodge's post about me being a "big pussy" should be evidence enough about the type of brats liberals have become.

    Woodsy 2.1

    ReplyDelete
  20. Woodsy 2.1... how the heck do you know that the Woodsy 3.9 post is by Mr. Dodge?

    Seems you are the one that needs to review the above posts and the facts as Mr. Dodge posted "Pine Cone 3.9", not "Woodsy 3.9". Duh!

    You claim Mr. Dodge is "Woodsy 3.9"?... based on what? Review the psots above and stop making stuff up.

    You posted "you'd be well served to understand".. dude, it was you that posted "Steve" with using no last name, as all can see above. It's you that would be "well served to understand" the facts.

    And now you post threats? This from someone that refuses to follow the stated use rules to use a real name and posts as George Rebane calls you no name hide in the bushes types... "sack heads" and now you make threats?

    Woodsy 2.1 whom ever you are, you are a hoot!

    ReplyDelete
  21. For the record, I did not post that comment as Woodsy 3.9. I use my real name at all times and believe it or not I am not the type of person to make that type of comment.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Noted Mr. Dodge.


    Mr. Enos, I could care less about your opinions sir. Furthermore, I'd submit you need some therapy for your Rebane Derangement Syndrome to go along with your Bush Derangement Syndrome. They do make medication for you delayed onset boomer-liberal narcissism.


    Thanks,

    Woodsy 2.1

    ReplyDelete
  23. Woodsy 2.1 or whatever you name really is... you post yopu "could care less about your opinions".. dandy, that ignore me and my opinions. Isn't that a simple soultion?

    hope you got the "Pine Cone 3.9" vs. "Woodsy 3.9" thing clear now.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Should be calling themselves "Conehead 3.9".....

    ReplyDelete
  25. Memo to Anonymous, whoever you are...I actually like the Conehead 3.9 handle, do I have your permission to use it?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Absolutely!

    Conehead name giver
    Grass Valley, CA

    ReplyDelete

Real name thank you.