Any topic any time. No profanity.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

The liberal ruination of logic and common sense regarding Islamic killers

It appears the lamestream media is now trying to soften their coverage of the Boston bomber.  They are now telling the people that actually still listen to them that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (AKA asshole murderer or AM), is just a 19 year old young man and is misunderstood.  Along with interviews with some of his classmates, AM is just a regular tyke (they use a pic of him at 14).  No wonder I want to retch whenever I accidentally turn on a lamestream news show.

PC is not going to work on this case.  Massachusetts is a liberal bastion and the people injured and killed not deserving of the AM bombing and murderer.  No, the people hurt and maimed will not accept the fact their perp was "misunderstood" or a real friend to the fellow he taught to wrestle.  Sorry lames, America will not buy what you are selling.

These brothers are Muslims who practiced their jihad on innocent people.  Just like the Barbary Pirates did in the Mediterranean in the 1700's.  Until Thomas Jefferson kicked their ass with Marines in Tripoli, those Muslims thought they were untouchable.  We need to make it clear we will not stand for a religious nut killing  our people.  When one nut kills a abortion doctor, the liberal media and their pals in PC World claim that is a example of Christian fundamentalism.  Why are these libs afraid to paint the Islamic world the same way?  Oh, because the jihadist's will come and cut off their heads? 

So, perhaps the lamestreams need to slap each other upside their heads and wake up.  If these jihadists win, (they have been trying since 650 A.D.), the press who is now fawning over these killers will be the first one's up against the wall or under the sword.  Wake up you fools!

26 comments:

  1. This morning's NPR did a piece on when to use the 'terrorist' word when talking about terrorist bombings like in Boston. During the entire segment three correspondents writhed mightily in avoiding any use or hint of 'Islam' or 'Muslim', until one of them toward the end finally had to use "Islamic jihad" without which his statement would have really sounded asinine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. George Orwell had it correct. Change the language. I want the word "gay" returned to its true meaning. Oh well.

      Delete
  2. Massachusetts is full of educated people. People who grasp complexity and the bigger pictures in the world. Maybe that's why you don't like it? :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who said I didn't like it? I am much smarter than you Jen but I still let you post here. LOL!

      Delete
    2. The bomber ain't a jihadist. He was an impressionable young man/boy who fell in with the older, jihadist-sympathizer, evil brother. In the absence of any family- and family was paramount to his native culture- his brother was everything. Typical follower, one which committed a murderous act. And he will be convicted of multiple capital offenses. What else would you like at this point?

      Delete
    3. Your typical liberal "excuses" for a jihadist killer is not unexpected. You should be ashamed of yourself.

      Delete
    4. All current evidence shows he's a young impressionable brother of an apparent low-rent domestic jihadist, who possibly got help from bad guys in Dagestan. The fact he's almost assuredly going to prison for life, or will be executed, isn't enough? LOL. Sorry it doesn't fit your flag waving, fantasy narrative of us against evil Islam. :)

      Delete
    5. Flag waving? You need to go back to school and study history honey. Jihad has been built into the Koran and has been practiced since Mohammed founded the religion. Read "Jefferson's War" for some background.

      Let me ask you something honey. When men are drafted into the military, why do you think they all take them at 18? Get back to us with you answer.

      Delete
    6. These brothers are the same level threat as Eric Rudolph, a professed Christian, out to save the world from abortionists. Your war on Islam ranting is pointless. Islam will continue to exist in the US and the world, and 99.5% of its followers will continue to follow sincerely peaceful aims.

      Delete
    7. Regarding what you call "excuses," of which I offer none for what these Boston punks did- indeed, we actually could use a whole lot more analysis and rationale study about why a tiny minority of Muslims actually hate the US enough to kill people, and pose a threat that doesn't appear to go away. Perhaps we all could take a look at the situation with the Palestinians since Israel occupied territory in 1948. Nah, wouldn't want to do that..would we..

      Delete
    8. Ah, speaking of service, tell me about your military service. Please :).

      Delete
    9. So let me see if I understand your analysis about the "boys". They murder indiscriminately, men ,women and children in the name of their religion, and they do this all over the world to any other religious people. And you claim that one nut, Rudolph, a man who targeted killers of babies as a moral equivalent? OK, I now understand.

      I did not serve in the military, why do you ask? How about you Jen, did you serve in the military?

      Delete
  3. OK, now I understand. Its OK to kill innocent people in Atlanta, as well as others who have had the misfortune to work at abortion clinics. Its OK to target inncoent people like my friend who happened to be having fun that night in Olympic Park in Atlanta. We understand your beliefs Todd.

    Yes, the boston bombers are EXACTLY the same as Eric Rudolph. Murderers.

    I didn't serve in the military as you konw. But I find it comical that you are obsessed with military service, since you didn't serve either, especially since it was a time of war and you must have been eligible. As Mr. Emery has pointed out on here several times. I'm not obsessed with the subject, and I don't judge Americans on their patriotism based on service.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You said the murder of abortion doctors Jen and that is what I responded to. Then like a good liberal you change the goalposts and spew phony outrage. What a hoot. Why did you not serve in the military Jen. I have explained my being in the first lottery and had a low number which was never called. How about you?

      I am not obsessed about the military service, you and PaulE are. You think because someone did not serve they have no right to comment about the military. You and he are exhibiting fascist behavior. Too bad. I once actually thought America was a land of free speech.

      What you don't get is that I oppose Rudolph as well as any other killers or terrorists. You however are showing quite the affinity for the Boston boys. I and most Americans find that very odd. Almost creepy.

      Delete
  4. Oh Todd, who is THEY, who murder all over the world? The Tzarnaev brothers are two punks. Radical Islamics are are tiny subset of Islam. Ya gonna "smoke em out" and "go git em"" like that loser GW Bush? Where you gonna go git em exactly? Which countries do we bomb first, and/or invade? Looking for some answers to the propositions you laid out there, big boy :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well let me see. Who are they? Well, 90% of all terrorist attacks are by Muslims Jen. Is that good enough? Honey, Jen, you are very misguided and thank God your not in charge of anything important, especially foreign policy. These jihadists have been around since 650 AD and they are everywhere. It appears you don't watch or listen to the news, but they declared war on us baby. They are being rooted out in Europe, Putin fights them in Russia and they are in Syria as we speak. Iran has harbored them and the Taliban are in cahoots with Al Queda. Benghazi, where they murdered our GV native Ambassador and omitted heinous acts on him, were in Libya. On and on.

      So, GW Bush at least kicked their ass when he found them and America did not have one terrorist attack in the balance of his term. So, Jen, baby doll, get educated about Islam and then return. I love it when I am defeating the unarmed.

      Delete
    2. Keep fighting your wars there, Todd, and good luck!

      Oh, and I'm sure you do realize you're a living, breathing freak show and embarrassment as a former public official.

      Delete
    3. Kinda personal there Jen honey. And what about my public service are you talking about? Now be concise or the readers will see how vacuous a liberals brain shell is. LOL!

      Delete
  5. Where are my very excellent comments from the other day, ha Toddster? Afraid they will humiliate you further, and destroy the entire premise of your blog post :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry Jen/cross dresser, I will not post your adoring comments on my TSA adored privates. Ain't gonna happen. Dream on.

      Delete
  6. The latest news on the Boston bombers- with the dumb Kazakh college students panicking with the duffle bags- indicate the case is much more about a murderous version of SNL's famous "Two Wild and Crazy Guys" than it is about some intense Jihadist vendetta. I would bet the naive, younger brother/follower, couldn't even tell you about the main tenets of the Koran. It was basically "Four Wild and Crazy Guys" plus Tamerlan and his very questionable mom.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jen/CDT I bet you gave old Fidel Castro the same breaks when he was a young fellow traipsing around the jungles of Cuba.

      Delete
    2. Oh yes, as you can see I'm giving the murdering brothers and their bumbling Kazakh friends a "break." Yes indeedy, supporting life imprisonment for the younger brother, and jail time for obstruction of justice of his Wild and Crazy friends, is considered a "break" in the very strange world of Todd J. Oh, but Todd, please keep on trying to find that suspected link from these bad boys in Boston to the Al Queda leadership. Just like your friend GWB and his quest for those WMDs in Iraq. Go Git em!

      Delete
    3. Jen, my world is the real world, yours is the liberal alternative universe. I think you people act to fast and need to start waiting a bit for the facts to be completed. I bet you also gave Hillary and Obama a pass on their Benghazi fiasco, right? Yep, you have a very odd wayof pickung losing fights for yourself.

      Delete
    4. Why did you change the subject when I made a very reasonable proposition to point out your lack of reading comprehension of my comments on the murdering Bros of Boston? So you decide to use instead the Faux News strategy of mentioning Benghazi..too funny.

      What break am I giving the Tzarneav family and anyone connected to them? Am I asking for leniency? LOL

      Delete
    5. Jen, you seem to be having a episode and perhaps a timeout into the medicine cabinet contents is in order. My reading is fine but yours is lacking in so many ways. You will not ascribe terrorist ties as a possibility to these nuts in Massachusetts. That is very troubling when we see the facts so far. You are simply making excuses for the bad boys. How are things in Truckee today?

      Delete

Real name thank you.