The left is going apoplectic resulting from in their stupidity about politics, endorsements and posters. It is why they will be defeated here and nationwide on November 2.
I have always had fun reading the opposition ideology (as embodied in the mainstream media) because it better prepares me when I debated them. Whether it was the Sacramento Bee, Newsweek, Time or the LA Times, I had to prepare to expose their bad facts, or their outright lies. Sierra in Peril was one of the first big lies given a lot of space by the Bee. It was a pile of crap, interviewing eco nuts and hardly (my recollection is a little foggy) people in affected business. The result was the destruction of the timber industry and since then, dredging, mining, mills and many more. And many small towns.
Sorry I diverted myself. Anyway, the liberals can't stop smacking each other around for who they endorsed for certain offices. I have been laughing my butt off reading their back and forth posts. They are so nasty, even to each other. They also don't like dissent. Since the posters are mostlt NCDCC members, they just complain endlessly about anyone who posts from a conservative perspective. They threaten expulsion and GASP, suggest banishment to conservative sites. I have been a critic of the left's dislike for free speech (except their own if you agree with them) and this tweaks them to the point of their need for medication.
Please feel free to post anywhere you choose, we on the right like the back an forth, the one upsmenship attempts and all the fun free speech should be about.
Todd,
ReplyDeleteCan I make a suggestion? Stop posting after the dinner hour. LOL.
-Jeff
Oh Todd, you're my hero, when I grow up I want to be just like you....
ReplyDelete(that must be what happens every night when you start dreaming.....)
Don't sugar-coat it...tell me how you really feel! LOL
ReplyDeleteWhat a cool thing these blogs are. You see, I allow Pelline to come over here without moderation and he doesn't allow me on his site. Now that's American exceptionalism, on the right that is.
ReplyDeleteTodd,
ReplyDeleteI know that nuances can be frustrating: You are allowed on my site. Your comments are moderated, however, because you broke the rules. On this site, you don't seem to have any rules — allowing some anonymous comments but not others, for example. Whatever.
-Jeff
The 'excitement' and 'hate' is going to only get worse as we approach November 2nd. It truly is too bad that some blogs get infected with personal attacks and bantering that goes way off subject. It robs us all of civility, and takes away the opportunity to learn something from all sides. I have always maintained that posters should use their real name. It adds accountability and perspective on the posting. Remaining anonymous is like pouring gasoline on a fire.
ReplyDeleteSee Todd, in the real world people like Jeff have to worry about things like Lawyers and Laws, whereas I'm sure that you will become very familiar with both of these groups, and not in a nice way.
ReplyDeleteI would love to see the case where you find your behind living in a tow behind trailer because you're too stupid to understand adult concepts like this....
Way to go Todd! And a hearty welcome again to furball blogging.
ReplyDeleteThanks George. As you can see the liberals posting here are arrogant and nasty and they even threaten me with lawyers! Well, sorry for them I have some good attorneys who keep me safe. I guess the left cannot compete here or any other places I can read so they they run around and threaten we conservatives. Pelline says can post on his blog but I choose not to because he will censor. I have allowed his friend anonymous to post here without censorship and Pelline still complains. Oh well, some people are just plain not happy and there is nothing to be done.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the point of this blog?
ReplyDeleteUse your real name, place something of value for discussion and be a hero.
ReplyDeleteUnless you are 'Papertiger' then you don't have to post your own name.
ReplyDeleteWe are aware you post under other names. Phony outrage. BTW, did you secure commitments for money while you were in DC? How many jobs did you confirm are to be created here in the county through your efforts? Will you be giving us all a report? Or is all that secret? What were the costs of your trip and where did the money come from? So many questions.
ReplyDeleteSo many questions? Don't think so. It's all pretty clear. Money is being provided to go green and save the world and our economy. Jobs will be created. So, instead of dumping dumb attitudes on Steve, you should be celebrating that he gives a big fat care.If you have no vision that isn't Frisch's problem.
ReplyDeleteThe President and Congress can see that "staying the Republican course" is a losing proposition. Vote NO on proposition 23 and thank Frisch for his efforts.
I have not posted under any name other than my own in years.
ReplyDeleteI am proud to use my name, and bothered by your double standard on anonymity. Its not phony outrage. Its just stupid for you to post that on your masthead and them ignore it for some posters.
No double standard. You need to calm down.
ReplyDeleteWhy is it you accuse others of being overly emotional when, in fact, you, by your lack of response proves again your intellectual impotence?
ReplyDeleteNo, I am a incredibly virile man. I sense inferiority in your responses.
ReplyDeleteThe let is coming up impotent though in their political life this year. Makes Americans of good will very happy.
How can you even say there is no double standard? Do you think people are stupid? Do you think they cannot see that you allow Papertiger to post anonymously while you require others to use their name? Are you really this much of a moron?
ReplyDeleteAw shucks Stevie, you were excoriating others for name calling. How could you.
ReplyDeleteTodd said to my statement that he is "intellectually impotent":
ReplyDelete"No, I am a incredibly virile man. I sense inferiority in your responses."
Huh? What?
Liberals are impotent. Now you get it?
ReplyDeleteTodd: How can you reconcile the idea of "smaller government" when you also espouse the idea of "Theocratic Rule"?
ReplyDeleteI do not believe in theocratic governance. I do think a people need to believe in something bigger than themselves. Guided by ethical and moral people should be a goal of any people. Liberalism lacks the traits needed for a moral and just government. Usually, in the modern age, Christianity has provided good and moral people. Of course there are exceptions but for the most part I will take the word of someone who believes in a higher being over a non believer of anything.
ReplyDelete